A new chapter begins
Mercer CFA Institute Global Pension Index 2025
An analysis and ranking of 52 pension systems around the world
Retirement systems globally grow more resilient
The Mercer CFA Institute Global Pension Index benchmarks 52 retirement income systems worldwide, spotlighting both challenges and opportunities for policymakers and investors. This year’s index expands with Kuwait, Namibia, Oman, and Panama added, incorporates updated OECD data, and introduces new integrity measures for sharper insights. Systems are assessed across three pillars, adequacy, sustainability, and integrity, using more than 50 indicators. In 2025, the Netherlands, Iceland, Denmark, Singapore and Israel all achieved coveted A-grades, with Singapore making history as the first Asian country to reach that standard. With eight upgrades and no downgrades, the results signal a long-term trend of strengthening resilience in pension systems globally.
Each year, the index also features a deep dive into a topical issue. In 2025, the focus is on the delicate balance governments face when encouraging private pension funds to invest in areas of national priority, raising important questions at the intersection of policy and retirement security.
Download the report below to discover more about the analysis and your pension system.
This year’s top rated pension systems
Netherlands
Index: 85.4
Rating: A
Iceland
Index: 84.0
Rating: A
Denmark
Index: 82.3
Rating: A
Top 3 rated systems for each sub-index
-
Adequacy
How much do you get?
1. Kuwait
2. Netherlands
3. France -
Sustainability
Can the system keep delivering?
1. Iceland
2. Denmark
3. Netherlands -
Integrity
Can the system be trusted?
1. Finland
2. Singapore
3. Hong Kong SAR
Instead of imposing mandates, governments should focus on making investment options attractive, promoting transparency and sound governance, and fostering collaboration with the private sector to support sustainable retirement systems and economic growth.
Lead author, Partner, Mercer
Overall rating for each pension system
- China [56.7] ▲
- Hong Kong SAR [70.6] ▲
- India [43.8] ▼
- Indonesia [51.0] ▲
- Japan [56.3] ▲
- Korea [53.9] ▲
- Malaysia [60.6] ▲
- Philippines [47.1] ▲
- Singapore [80.8] ▲
- Taiwan [51.8] ▼
- Thailand [50.6] ▲
- Vietnam [53.7] ▼
- Austria [54.5] ▲
- Belgium [69.2] ▲
- Croatia [68.7] ▲
- Denmark [82.3] ▲
- Finland [76.6] ▲
- France [70.3] ▲
- Germany [67.8] ▲
- Iceland [84.0] ▲
- Ireland [67.7] ▼
- Italy [57.0] ▲
- Netherlands [85.4] ▲
- Norway [76.0] ▲
- Poland [57.0] ▲
- Portugal [67.6] ▲
- Spain [63.8] ▲
- Sweden [78.2] ▲
- Switzerland [72.4] ▲
- United Kingdom [72.2] ▲
- Botswana [59.8]
- Israel [80.3] ▲
- Kazakhstan [65.0] ▲
- Kuwait [71.9]
- Namibia [59.1]
- Oman [60.9]
- Saudi Arabia [67.6] ▲
- South Africa [51.0] ▲
- Turkey [48.2] ▼
- United Arab Emirates [64.9] ▲
- Argentina [45.9] ▲
- Brazil [56.2] ▲
- Chilli [76.6] ▲
- Colombia [62.5] ▼
- Mexico [69.3] ▲
- Panama [59.1]
- Peru [55.3] ▲
- Uruguay [71.1] ▲
- Australia [77.6] ▲
- New Zealand [70.4] ▲
- Canada [70.4] ▲
- United States of America [61.1] ▲
Balancing government influence on private pension fund investments
With governments around the world considering how to adopt measures to regulate, restrict, or influence private pension fund investments, this year’s feature chapter reviews current policies, the rationale behind them, and the principles that can guide a balance between serving pension plan participants and advancing broader national interests.
In many countries, governments impose direct or indirect restrictions on pension fund assets. The OECD noted in 2022 that only a minority of countries impose no ceilings, relying solely on the prudent person principle. Recent debates have also highlighted the role of pension funds in supporting long-term societal and economic goals, prompting governments to consider encouraging domestic investment in areas of national priority.
This chapter reviews these restrictions and their alignment with the fundamental objective of serving participants’ best interests. It also proposes eight principles to guide collaboration between governments and the pension industry:
- The primary purpose of pension funds is to provide retirement income to the fund’s participants and their dependants
- Trustees and fiduciaries must act in the best interests of the pension fund’s beneficiaries
- Pension legislation should require all pension funds to develop a comprehensive investment policy and to have sound investment governance practices
- Pension funds must consider the full range of available investment opportunities, recognising that available opportunities are impacted by a country’s economic development
- Governments can make particular investments attractive to pension funds without the use of compulsion and should refrain from requiring a ‘floor’ level of investment in a particular asset class. The actual investment decision should be left to the pension fund
- Pension funds should collaborate together and with government to increase investment opportunities in areas where pension funds may not otherwise have the scale or risk appetite to invest; e.g. infrastructure projects through public private partnerships
- There should be transparent public disclosure relating to the actual investments held, their returns and risks, but no performance tests or fee caps applied to pension fund investments
- When private pension fund assets are a significant percentage of GDP, governments must recognise the impact and interactions between their fiscal and social policies and the implications for present and future retirees
Pension systems work best when they balance innovation and national priorities with the enduring responsibility to serve end-investors' interests.
CFA, President & CEO, CFA Institute
See also: Supplementary report
Meet our lead author and contributors
Before you access this page, please read and accept the terms and legal notices below. You’re about to enter a page intended for sophisticated, institutional investors only.
This content is provided for informational purposes only. The information provided does not constitute, and should not be construed as, an offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy, any securities, or an offer, invitation or solicitation of any specific products or the investment management services of Mercer, or an offer or invitation to enter into any portfolio management mandate with Mercer.
Past performance is not an indication of future performance. If you are not able to accept these terms and conditions, please decline and do not proceed further. We reserve the right to suspend or withdraw access to any page(s) included on this website without notice at any time and Mercer accepts no liability if, for any reason, these pages are unavailable at any time or for any period.